NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+18592%
92.9 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
320
576
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
105W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV670
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
