NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1280MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1280GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 152.0GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 's Advantages
Lower TDP (210W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+6980%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
1.312 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1280MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
152.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
14
18432
Shading Units
448
576
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
40
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.50 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
40.99 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1312 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
164.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
210W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF110
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-270-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
