NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 138% (2520MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Lower TDP (195W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+2758%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680
3.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
1536
576
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
195W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GK104
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
