NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Moore Threads MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S80 's Advantages
Lower TDP (255W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+529%
92.9 TFLOPS
MTT S80
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
144
SM Count
18432
Shading Units
4096
576
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
256
576
Tensor Cores
144
RT Cores
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
255W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
22 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
