NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 800W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2004
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
-
576
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
25W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
NV43
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
