NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 644.6GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2920MHz vs 2520MHz)
Lower TDP (300W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+94%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon AI PRO R9700
47.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2025
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
4096
576
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
128
576
Tensor Cores
128
144
RT Cores
64
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
300W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Navi 48
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
