Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 171% (2520MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada +9658%
92.9 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 40
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
512
576
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
65W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy