NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2550MHz vs 2520MHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+42%
92.9 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
100
18432
Shading Units
12800
576
TMUs
400
192
ROPs
176
576
Tensor Cores
400
144
RT Cores
100
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
250W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
AD102
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
