NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (2520MHz vs 1762MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+3333%
92.9 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
6
18432
Shading Units
768
576
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
16
576
Tensor Cores
24
144
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
50W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GA107
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
