NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FireMV 2260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+27325%
10.97 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV620
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
