NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+351%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
