NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+2107%
10.97 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV670
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
