Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +997%
10.97 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
RV770
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy