NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+997%
10.97 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
800
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV770
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
