NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+5735%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
9
3584
Shading Units
72
224
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GT215
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
