NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+28028%
10.97 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 10
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GT218
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
