NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+10870%
10.97 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 10
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
1
3584
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GF119
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
