NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2004
GeForce 10
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
12
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
NV41
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
130 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
