NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2004
GeForce 10
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
NV43
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
110 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
