NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1880MHz vs 1531MHz)
Lower TDP (205W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+26%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700
8.663 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
+15%
9844
Radeon Pro W5700
8549
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
TITAN X Pascal
+17%
4812
Radeon Pro W5700
4103
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2304
224
TMUs
144
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
205W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 10
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
