NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 281W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2525MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
+312%
45.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Apr 2023
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1895 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2525 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
70
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4480
224
TMUs
280
96
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
323.2 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.0 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
90.50 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.25 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
281W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 31
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
