NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+802%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 10
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
