NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
RV530
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650
(215CCCBKB12FG)
Pascal
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
90 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
