Home GPU Comparison Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD FirePro A300

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 605 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel UHD Graphics 605 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (5W vs 65W)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (905MHz vs 750MHz)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 605
0.216 TFLOPS
FirePro A300 +221%
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-T
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

200 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
750 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
144
Shading Units
384
18
TMUs
24
3
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.250 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
13.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
216.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Gemini Lake GT1.5
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Generation 9.5
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Board Design

5W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy