Home GPU Comparison Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 605 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel UHD Graphics 605 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (5W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1150MHz vs 750MHz)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 605
0.216 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 +240%
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
HD Graphics-T
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

200 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
750 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
144
Shading Units
320
18
TMUs
40
3
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.250 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
13.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
432.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
216.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Gemini Lake GT1.5
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

5W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy