Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2013
Voodoo4-2
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
2
TMUs
192
2
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
GK110B
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
GK110-300-B1
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy