Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 590 GME

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 GME to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME 's Advantages
Boost Clock1420MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2020
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1257 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1420 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
2
TMUs
144
2
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.44 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
204.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.543 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
6.543 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
409.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
Polaris 20
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XTR (215-0910066)
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
180 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy