Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 345W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2017
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1406 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1677 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
2
TMUs
256
2
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.3 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
429.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.48 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
13.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
858.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
345W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
Vega 10
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
180 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy