Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs ATI Radeon X1050

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs ATI Radeon X1050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 24W)
ATI Radeon X1050 's Advantages
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3.200GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
143 MHz
Memory Clock
200 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
3.200GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
TMUs
8
2
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
24W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
RV410
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
-
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
110 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
0.12 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
1.1
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy