Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs ATI Radeon X1650

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1650 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
143 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
TMUs
4
2
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Board Design

15W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
RV516
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
-
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
180 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
1.1
OpenGL
2.1
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy