Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
166 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
2.656GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
-
Shading Units
768
2
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

332.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
332.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
Navi 24
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy