Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7 350 OEM

GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 350 OEM Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
Radeon R7 350 OEM +108%
806
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Oland
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
Oland XT


(215-0837000)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy