Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro V620

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 300W)
Radeon Pro V620 Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon Pro V620 +3274%
20280
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
72
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT


(215-121000177)
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy