Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 475W)
Radeon Pro Vega II Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon Pro Vega II +2244%
14090
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
475W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Vega 20
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy