Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 205W)
Radeon Pro W5700X Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon Pro W5700X +1637%
10440
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Dec 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
205W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 10
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy