Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon PRO W6300 Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon PRO W6300 +421%
3133
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 24
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy