Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro W6800X

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 200W)
Radeon Pro W6800X Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon Pro W6800X +2567%
16030
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy