Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 190W)
Radeon PRO W7700 Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon PRO W7700 +5216%
31950
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
48
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Navi 32
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy