Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon R9 270 1024SP

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon R9 270 1024SP +215%
1894
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Mar 2015
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO


(215-0828062)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy