Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon R9 280X2

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 375W)
Radeon R9 280X2 Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
Radeon R9 280X2 +581%
4096
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 400
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Tahiti
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL


(215-0821065)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy