Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2000MHz HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs. 4 cores 1400MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.0576 TFLOPS vs 0.024 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2000MHz vs 1400MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 28nm)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 650 +137%
57
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
24
VS

CPU

4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53
2000 MHz
Frequency
1400 MHz
8
Cores
4
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
16 nm
Process
28 nm
4
Transistor count
1
5 W
TDP
5 W
-
Manufacturing
Samsung

Graphics

Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
Adreno 308
900 MHz
GPU frequency
500 MHz
2
Execution units
1
16
Shading units
24
4
Max size
4
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.024 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.0
1.2
OpenCL version
1.2
11
DirectX version
11

Memory

LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR3
933 MHz
Memory frequency
667 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
5.34 Gbit/s

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 536
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
1280 x 800
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 30FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
X6

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 5
No
5G support
No
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 150 Mbps
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 75 Mbps
4
Wi-Fi
5
4.1
Bluetooth
4.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Jan 2016
Announced
Feb 2016
Mid range
Class
Low end
Hi6250
Model number
MSM8917

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy