Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Samsung Exynos 2500

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2120MHz HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs. 10 cores 3200MHz Samsung Exynos 2500 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

Samsung Exynos 2500 Advantages
Higher Frequency (3200MHz vs 2120MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 16nm)
Released 8 years and 1 months late

Score

VS

CPU

4x 2.12 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X5
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A730
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A520
2120 MHz
Frequency
3200 MHz
8
Cores
10
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
16 nm
Process
3 nm
4
Transistor count
-
5 W
TDP
-
-
Manufacturing
Samsung

Graphics

Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
-
900 MHz
GPU frequency
-
2
Execution units
-
16
Shading units
-
4
Max size
24
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
1.0
Vulkan version
-
1.2
OpenCL version
-
11
DirectX version
-

Memory

LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR5T
933 MHz
Memory frequency
4800 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
76.8 Gbit/s

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
UFS 4.0
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
-
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
-
4
Wi-Fi
7
4.1
Bluetooth
5.4
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Dec 2016
Announced
Jan 2025
Mid range
Class
Flagship

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy