Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Unisoc Tiger T616

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs Unisoc Tiger T616

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2350MHz HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs. 8 cores 2000MHz Unisoc Tiger T616 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

HiSilicon Kirin 658 Advantages
Higher Frequency (2350MHz vs 2000MHz)
Unisoc Tiger T616 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.096 TFLOPS vs 0.0576 TFLOPS )
More modern manufacturing process (12nm vs 16nm)
Released 3 years and 10 months late

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
HiSilicon Kirin 658
206
Unisoc Tiger T616 +119%
453
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
HiSilicon Kirin 658
729
Unisoc Tiger T616 +106%
1509
FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 658
57
Unisoc Tiger T616 +68%
96
VS

CPU

4x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
2350 MHz
Frequency
2000 MHz
8
Cores
8
16 nm
Process
12 nm
4
Transistor count
-
5 W
TDP
-
-
Manufacturing
TSMC

Graphics

Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
900 MHz
GPU frequency
750 MHz
2
Execution units
1
16
Shading units
64
4
Max size
6
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.096 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.3
1.2
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
11

Memory

LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR4X
933 MHz
Memory frequency
1866 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit

AI

No
NPU
No

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
No
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
5
4.1
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Mar 2017
Announced
Jan 2021
Mid range
Class
Low end

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy