HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2400MHz HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs. 8 cores 2350MHz HiSilicon Kirin 658 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.4423 TFLOPS vs 0.0576 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2400MHz vs 2350MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 16nm)
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
+675%
442
HiSilicon Kirin 658
57
CPU
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
Architecture
4x 2.35 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
2400 MHz
Frequency
2350 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
7 nm
Process
16 nm
-
Transistor count
4
-
TDP
5 W
SMIC
Manufacturing
-
Graphics
Mali-G610 MP4
GPU name
Mali-T830 MP2
864 MHz
GPU frequency
900 MHz
-
Execution units
2
128
Shading units
16
12
Max size
4
0.4423 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0576 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.0
2.0
OpenCL version
1.2
-
DirectX version
11
Memory
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR3
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
933 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 32 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
-
Max display resolution
1920 x 1200
-
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Balong
Modem
-
Connectivity
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
Yes
5G support
No
-
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
-
Upload speed
Up to 50 Mbps
6
Wi-Fi
5
5.2
Bluetooth
4.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Info
Oct 2024
Announced
Mar 2017
Mid range
Class
Mid range
