Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 2400

HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 2400

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2200MHz HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs. 10 cores 3210MHz Samsung Exynos 2400 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

Samsung Exynos 2400 Advantages
Higher Frequency (3210MHz vs 2200MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 28nm)
Released 8 years and 9 months late

Score

VS

CPU

4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
2200 MHz
Frequency
3210 MHz
8
Cores
10
512 MB
L2 cache
-
28 nm
Process
4 nm
1
Transistor count
-
7 W
TDP
-
-
Manufacturing
Samsung

Graphics

Mali-T628 MP4
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 940
680 MHz
GPU frequency
1009 MHz
4
Execution units
-
16
Shading units
-
8
Max size
24
0.087 TFLOPS
FLOPS
-
1.0
Vulkan version
-
1.1
OpenCL version
-
11
DirectX version
-

Memory

LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR5X
1600 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
12.8 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-

AI

No
NPU
Yes

Multimedia (ISP)

No
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0
Storage type
UFS 4.0
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
1x 32MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 320MP
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
8K at 60FPS
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
Exynos 5300

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 6
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 9640 Mbps
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 2550 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
7
4.2
Bluetooth
5.4
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Apr 2015
Announced
Jan 2024
Mid range
Class
Flagship
-
Model number
S5E9945
-
Official page

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy