Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Intel Core 7 160UL vs Intel Celeron N5095

Intel Core 7 160UL vs Intel Celeron N5095

We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core 7 160UL with 10 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Celeron N5095 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core 7 160UL Advantages
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-5200 vs DDR4-2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 4MB)
Intel Celeron N5095 Advantages
Released 120 years late
Integrated graphics card
Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.8GHz)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jan 1901
Release Date
Jan 2021
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake-U
Core Architecture
Jasper Lake
-
Processor Number
N5095
Intel BGA 1744
Socket
BGA-1338
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U)
Generation
-

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
Intel BGA 1744
Socket
BGA-1338
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
Intel
Foundry
-
FC-BGA16F
Package
-

CPU Performance

2
Performance Cores
4
4
Performance Core Threads
4
1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
8
Efficiency Cores
-
8
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1200 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
3.9 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
10
Total Core Count
4
12
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18.0
Multiplier
20x
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
-
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
384 K per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
Memory Types
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933
-
Max Memory Size
16 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
83.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
750 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
16
-
Power Consumption
6 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.24 TFLOPS

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
4
PCIe Version
3.0
8
PCIe Lanes
8

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy