MediaTek Helio G200 vs Unisoc T606
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2200MHz MediaTek Helio G200 vs. 8 cores 1600MHz Unisoc T606 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
MediaTek Helio G200 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.1408 TFLOPS vs 0.0832 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2200MHz vs 1600MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (6nm vs 12nm)
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G200
+73%
444826
Unisoc T606
256256
FP32 (float)
MediaTek Helio G200
+68%
140
Unisoc T606
83
CPU
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
2200 MHz
Frequency
1600 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.1-A
-
L2 cache
2 MB
-
L3 cache
0
6 nm
Process
12 nm
TSMC
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
Mali-G57 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP1
1100 MHz
GPU frequency
650 MHz
-
Execution units
1
32
Shading units
64
12
Max size
8
0.1408 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0832 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
12
DirectX version
11
Memory
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
1600 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
17.1 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
No
UFS 2.2
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
2160 x 1080
1x 200MP, 2x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.265
- VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 13
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 650 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
5
5.4
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
