CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
VS
MediaTek Helio P95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2200MHz MediaTek Helio P95 vs. 8 cores 1800MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
MediaTek Helio P95 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.1552 TFLOPS vs 0.1248 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2200MHz vs 1800MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (12nm vs 14nm)
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio P95
+67%
301054
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
179988
Geekbench 6 Single Core
MediaTek Helio P95
+54%
456
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
296
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
MediaTek Helio P95
+48%
1555
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
1047
FP32 (float)
MediaTek Helio P95
+25%
155
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
124
MediaTek Helio P95
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
CPU
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53)
2200 MHz
Frequency
1800 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
1 MB
L2 cache
-
12 nm
Process
14 nm
-
Transistor count
2
5 W
TDP
5 W
TSMC
Manufacturing
Samsung
Graphics
PowerVR GM9446
GPU name
Adreno 506
970 MHz
GPU frequency
650 MHz
10
Execution units
1
8
Shading units
96
8
Max size
8
0.1552 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1248 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.0
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
12
DirectX version
11
Memory
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR3
1866 MHz
Memory frequency
933 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
13.91 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-
Multimedia (ISP)
MediaTek APU 2.0
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 546
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
2520 x 1080
Max display resolution
1900 x 1200
1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
Max camera resolution
1x 40MP, 2x 13MP
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
X9
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 12
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 600 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 150 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
5
5.0
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
Info
Feb 2020
Announced
Jun 2018
Mid range
Class
Mid range
MT6779V/CV
Model number
SDM632
MediaTek Helio P95
Official page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Related SoC Comparison
1
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Google Tensor
2
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
3
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Helio X30
4
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
5
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Helio P22
6
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
7
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
8
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
9
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
10
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy