Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro K2000

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 51W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +57%
1151
Quadro K2000
733
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK107
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy