Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI210

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI210 Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Radeon Instinct MI210 +1866%
22630
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
512
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy