Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs HiSilicon Kirin 650

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 4 cores 1400MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 vs. 8 cores 2000MHz HiSilicon Kirin 650 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

HiSilicon Kirin 650 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.0576 TFLOPS vs 0.024 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2000MHz vs 1400MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (16nm vs 28nm)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
24
HiSilicon Kirin 650 +137%
57
VS

CPU

4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1400 MHz
Frequency
2000 MHz
4
Cores
8
28 nm
Process
16 nm
1
Transistor count
4
5 W
TDP
5 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
-

Graphics

Adreno 308
GPU name
Mali-T830 MP2
500 MHz
GPU frequency
900 MHz
1
Execution units
2
24
Shading units
16
4
Max size
4
0.024 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0576 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.0
1.2
OpenCL version
1.2
11
DirectX version
11

Memory

LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR3
667 MHz
Memory frequency
933 MHz
2x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 32 Bit
5.34 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
-

AI

Hexagon 536
NPU
No

Multimedia (ISP)

Hexagon 536
Neural processor (NPU)
No
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
1280 x 800
Max display resolution
1920 x 1200
1x 16MP
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
1K at 30FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
X6
Modem
-

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 5
4G support
LTE Cat. 7
No
5G support
No
Up to 150 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 75 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 50 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
4
4.1
Bluetooth
4.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Feb 2016
Announced
Jan 2016
Low end
Class
Mid range
MSM8917
Model number
Hi6250

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy